Dignitas, Pietas, Virtus - Santiago Iniguez

www.SantiagoIniguez.com, Dean of IE Business School

If the Ancient Roman Empire had extended its hegemony until our age, we would be living in year 2,761 “ab urbe condita” (in Latin meaning “since the foundation of the city”, in reference to Rome) and next Monday, March 24, would be marking the beginning of a new academic year, in honor to Minerva, the Roman goddess of wisdom and knowledge. Rome, however, succumbed like other empires, but Latin culture is omnipresent in Western thinking and traditions, including the way we conceive and practice education. In fact, Minerva, characterized as an owl, still appears in the brands or emblems of many educational and cultural organizations worldwide.

If you were aristocratic enough to attend your first school day in Ancient Rome, you would probably realize from the start about the weight of traditions, the importance given to your family ancestors and the deep sense of commitment to the community. “Patricians” –members of wealthy families- normally received education at home, since formal schools were only a late development in the Roman Empire and attended mostly by the less socially favoured. Education in Rome was discriminatory and attended only by men, and its main purpose could be encapsulated by the triad: “Dignitas, Pietas, Virtus” a set of values with many different meanings, but pivoting on the Ancient Roman mindset composed of ideas such as fitness, suitability, worthiness, distinction, personal reputation, moral standing, seriousness, clout, sense of duty and respect for traditions. Cicero once wrote: “Indeed, what is the life of a man if it is not related with the memories of human deeds and the lives of our ancestors”.

The education of leaders in Ancient Rome was shaped on the crucible of past traditions and community values. Most attention was given to the hard skills, whereas subjects like Rhetoric became increasingly accepted in order to succeed in public life, particularly for winning votes at the Senate -a precedent of the importance of communication skills for leaders. Incidentally, the better masters of Rhetoric were Greek, many of them slaves, since they had a long a solid tradition in the field. Sports were not core to the education of Romans but just as a way to acquire fighting skills for eventual combat. 

Interestingly, formal schools in Ancient Rome were originally called “ludi” (in Latin, plural of “ludus”, meaning game). This resembles the importance given by Romans to games and enjoyment as essential to the learning process.  Should we be guided by past traditions and explore ways to strengthen game-based learning in education today?

Comments

[Rafael Mompo]

I think that if we were in year 2,761 ab urbe condita, sure the “ludi” thing would be now called “Learning 2.0”, that is, new generations of young citizens using Internet 2.0 concepts and tools in their daily life, also for learning. Indeed, I am using that concept for teaching purposes and it really works!

I am convinced that we are entering an era in which education will be effectively spread all over the world; that is, the true democracy that no civilization has enjoyed before. If Romans had had Internet, no doubt Romanization would have been accomplished by using Internet 2.0 e-learning tools.